A Comparative Study of the Discourse of the Constitutional Revolution and the Islamic Revolution with Emphasis on the Opinions of Mirza Naeini and Imam Khomeini

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Student in Political Science, Department of Cognition of Iran, Faculty of Political Science, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Political Thought, Faculty of Political Science, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Among the discourses of contemporary Iranian history, the most important and influential ones have been the subject of this research and the social and political, internal and external contexts of the formation of both discourses and their effects and consequences have been studied and analyzed. The commonalities and differences between the two discourses and the views of the theorists of those two discourses, namely Imam Khomeini and Allameh Naeini, have been explored. It is in the Islamic Revolution. Also, understanding the effect of social and political conditions on the emergence of political structures different from the views of Mirza Naeini and Imam Khomeini and recognizing the commonalities and differences between the views of Mirza Naeini and Imam Khomeini are other objectives of this study. Based on the findings of this study, some of the most important results are that, discourses as general and semantic formulations themselves are the product of certain social and political conditions and shape the behaviors, thoughts and identities of social subjects and without Discourses cannot make social and political developments meaningful. Therefore, in order to understand social phenomena such as revolutions, they must be studied within discourse formulations

Keywords

Political Sociology of Iran
Volume 5, Issue 7
September 2022
Pages 280-296

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics