Prevention of conflict of views by emphasizing the law of civil procedure of Iran and France

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Student in Private Law, Department of Law, Damghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Damghan, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Damghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Damghan, Iran (Corresponding Author)

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

Abstract

In order to identify and understand the conflict of opinions, considering the place of the word in the science of principles and in the case of the conflict of arguments, we mention the definitions that the fundamentalists had and still have. Conflict in its lexical form from the root "width" means to express and is often used in the terms of the fundamentalists, meaning incompatibility and incompatibility of the two reasons for their meaning. Conflicts of opinion in courts and dispute resolution bodies are likely to occur in a variety of ways. Various reasons can be the cause of conflict between votes, which occurs through violations of the law or judicial procedure; But the most important issue is the conflict of views, which can be examined from various aspects. In this way, how the conflict of votes occurs or causes conflict between the votes, but we intend to take a special look at how the conflict of votes in the judicial system of Iran and France and how to prevent its realization. Therefore, it seems that the realization of the conflict of votes depends on the type of judicial and legal system of the country. The present article is based on the library method and is descriptive-analytical.

Keywords

Political Sociology of Iran
Volume 5, Issue 8
October 2022
Pages 2070-2083

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics