The principles and disadvantages governing alternative methods of resolving disputes in family lawsuits

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Private Law, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran.

2 Department of Private Law, Qom branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran (corresponding author).

3 Department of Private Law, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran

Abstract

One of the social institutions that is always affected by the transformation of societies is the family institution, the growth and development of communication can affect its various dimensions, including the type of family disputes, or change their nature, and as a result, changes in dispute resolution systems will be inevitable. . Now, this change does not mean changing the governing rules and regulations, but sometimes using old models or neglected existing facilities can work.
Reducing the process of dealing with disputes and lawsuits in Iran's judicial system has always been one of the concerns of the officials of the judicial system. On the other hand, promoting peace and compromise by using a legal and of course completely rational potential is one of the solutions that can help the judicial system more and more in traveling the path. In this research, we are trying to find with a descriptive and analytical method, and it is thought that the use of out-of-court dispute resolution methods based on arbitration or a combination system of these methods with the judicial system (courts) can provide more protection than the judicial system alone for the family with to bring with him

Keywords

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics