Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1
PhD Student, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Humanities, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran
2
Assistant Professor of Law, Faculty of Humanities, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran, Assistant Professor and Faculty Member of Shahrekord University
3
Assistant Professor of Law, Faculty of Humanities, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran
Abstract
Punishment as a social reaction is accompanied by the deliberate imposition of suffering, destruction or loss of dignity and deprivation of the rights of individuals. For this reason, the application of such a reaction requires a proper explanation and justification. Among them, the theory of punishment of moral baroque behavior has been considered as one of the oldest claimants of justification of punishment. But in a significant part of the twentieth century, this idea was considered a retrograde and abandoned idea by criminologists, criminologists and philosophers of criminal law. But the last decades of the twentieth century are the time of the resurrection of the punitive paradigm, so that many critics of this thought became serious supporters of it. This article seeks to explore the reasons for its pros and cons while exploring the reasons for the enthusiastic acceptance of experts in the field of criminal justice. It should be said that criminal law is based on principles and mechanisms that are based on the principles and components of policy. Criminal is the legal, economic and political foundations, each of which can play an important role in the legislative process and Godard and ultimately achieve the goal of the criminal justice system is the establishment of justice.
Keywords
)