Review of international agreements and criteria for determining the law governing their liability and civil liability

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Student in Private Law, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

2 Department of Law, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

Abstract

The Civil Code, despite the fact that the conflict resolution rule is clear for the sections of personal status, contracts, property and type of documents, has not answered about non-contractual responsibilities. And so the court must enforce Iranian law on civil liability claims, whether they have a foreign element or not? Or is there a conflict resolution rule and that is the principle of territoriality of laws? That is, the Iranian court considers this principle as a rule for resolving conflicts of law and implements Iranian law on civil liability? The present article seeks to show that neither of these two correct attitudes should be the rule for resolving "communication groups" and that non-contractual responsibilities should be as conflicting as the others. Good slow. This is why the law governing civil liability was chosen. The role of the rule of will in determining the governing law has received considerable attention, and this is the right. At the same time, in the absence of mutual consent, the crime scene law is still the best solution.

Keywords

Political Sociology of Iran
Volume 5, Issue 10
December 2022
Pages 1027-1046

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics