Limiting the limits of music in terms of Islamic law in the jurisprudence of the two parties

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Student in Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor of Law, Qom University, Qom, Iran.

Abstract

All human beings naturally tend to be rich and listen to beautiful sounds. Religious people, knowing that Ghana is forbidden and condemned by Islam, may be worried about rebellion while listening to Ghana, and thus experience internal unrest. This causes these people not to enjoy the richness and beautiful sound of the permissible. This research intends to separate the field of halal richness from haram richness and to carry out the necessary study in each case and to pay attention to the verses and hadiths of each chapter and the views of the arb-e-Nazar; At the end of each chapter, after the necessary summary, the author's opinion is expressed. It is noteworthy that there is a deep disagreement among experts on the truth of the title of Ghana and also on the subject of the ruling on sanctity; In a way, it can be said that few sentences or the subject of a sentence can be found to be so controversial that some consider the "absolute richness" to be haram. They consider every beautiful voice to be rich; Although not vulgar. On the other hand, there are those who do not consider any kind of richness to be haram and consider its sanctity to be due to "causal" causes, not inherent; Like Feyz Kashani. Many scholars have also gone through the middle way and have enriched Ghana with an exciting adverb, that is, being a musician, and some of the other adverbs that we will address in this study.

Keywords