Claims arising from the acquisition of urban lands and the method of compensation

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 International branch of Qeshm University

2 Assistant Professor of Law Education, Hormozgan University, Hormozgan, Iran

3 Department of Law, Qeshm International Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qeshm, Iran

Abstract

The issue of state expropriation is important in public law in several ways.
First, the basis for governments to authorize the expropriation and ownership of other people's private property.Second, the legal nature and forms of expropriation in the public interest; And third, dispute resolution authorities. According to the results of this study, an important element that makes the Islamic State can trust it when necessary to seize private property if necessary, is the priority of public and community interests over individual interests. Accordingly, the theoretical foundations of acquisition as one of the examples of government administration is based on public service theory, because acquisition is in a position to eliminate the conflict between collective and individual interests and because of public services and the use of preferential management laws in ownership. Supported by the same services. Claims arising out of land ownership are largely legal, and dispute resolution authorities in this area are divided into specialized and general categories. Numerous criticisms of specialized authorities related to the settlement of disputes over the ownership of urban lands are the cases in which the non-publicity of the meetings and the impossibility of the non-governmental party to attend these meetings are the most important criticisms in this regard.

Keywords

Political Sociology of Iran
Volume 5, Issue 3
June 2022
Pages 1175-1188

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics