Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1
PhD Student in Private Law, Department of Law, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran
2
Assistant Professor of Private Law, Golestan University. Gorgan.iran
3
Assistant Professor, Law Department, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran.
10.30510/psi.2022.301927.2209
Abstract
Curiosity transactions are an undeniable fact in our society today, and such transactions have caused people to face the effects and consequences, to the extent that in the courts, judicial proceedings are observed in these cases. Regarding the nature of a usurious transaction, it should be acknowledged that a contract is a comprehensive set of elements and conditions of contracts that are hindered simply because its effects return to a non-property or person, and the penetration of this type of contract depends on removing the obstacle by announcing permission. Is. According to Article 247 of the Civil Code, a voyeur is a person who, without having a position, transacts for himself or for others without the permission of the owner. Regarding the effects of voyeur legal acts, by examining and searching for voyeur contracts and agreements, it can be achieved that these effects are common to the majority of voyeur contracts and agreements, and even the civil liability of the voyeur is affected by the coercive guarantees. Also, the scope of prying transactions in today's society has been such that it has gone beyond purely private transactions to the point that in many administrative and government transactions we see such contracts, and in general in this regard with three types of transactions: correct, invalid And we are faced with impenetrability, even in appearance
Keywords
)