Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1
PhD Student, Department of Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, Babol Branch, Islamic Azad University, Babol, Iran.
2
Assistant Professor, Department of Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, Babol Branch, Islamic Azad University, Babol, Iran
3
Assistant Professor, Department of Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, Babol Branch, Islamic Azad University, Babol, Iran.
10.30510/psi.2022.306773.2373
Abstract
In the field of government jurisprudence, three views can be imagined; Methodological views, subject views
Epistemologies and perspectives on total inference. The methodological and thematic point of view makes it clear that governmental jurisprudence and traditional jurisprudence are not structurally different from each other. What separates these two views from each other is the perspective of these two views on issues and changes in the type of similar rulings and executive requirements of the government. These theories have been a kind of methodological and thematic broadening from (individualistic view) to (sovereign view), although the nature of these theories is a theme of the existing jurisprudential outlines and issues. Corresponding views on Klinger's understanding contain two thoughts and beliefs. Martyr Sadr's theory, which is based on the premise that the precepts of Islam should never be examined as precepts that are not related to each other and each of them presents a separate command and is independent of the other commands; Because these rulings seem irrelevant at first. On the other hand, if they are examined collectively and as a whole, we find that they are in fact moving in a circle and discovering the basic goals, rules, and theories of Islam, in other words, the foundations of the school. They do. The second theory is related to some writers and the Academy of Islamic Sciences.
Keywords
)