Examining the course of Iranian legislator's thoughts about the punishment of imprisonment and the views in favor and against

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD student, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Najaf Abad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najaf Abad, Iran

2 Department of Law, Najaf Abad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najaf Abad, Iran

3 Assistant Professor of Law, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran

10.30510/psi.2023.356306.3838

Abstract

Wherever a society is formed, there are also rights, and where governments consider the establishment of regulations useful for the flow of order and harmony in social life, it is necessary that these regulations be implemented on time against those who violate them. should be placed and the guarantee of the predicted executions should also be applied against them; The most severe of these executions are of a criminal type, and imprisonment is one of the accepted methods of preventing crimes and mistakes or their repetition and punishing criminals, especially those who commit theft. This punishment is the legislative history of Iran's penal law, explaining the thoughts of supporters and opponents to evaluate the weaknesses and strengths of this punishment.
The question that arises in this article is, what is the opinion of the Iranian legislator regarding imprisonment? Unfortunately, the existence of many criminal titles with the punishment of imprisonment indicates that imprisonment and sending to prison has been considered as the most accessible tool for punishment and punishment, without taking into account the purpose of the punishments. Imprisonment should be fundamentally revised in the amount and number of criminal titles leading to imprisonment, and the judges handling the cases should be encouraged to use alternative punishments.

Keywords