Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1
PhD student in Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch (Khorasgan), Isfahan, Iran.
2
Associate Professor, Department of Law, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran (Corresponding Author)
3
Assistant Professor, Department of Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch (Khorasgan), Isfahan, Iran.
10.30510/psi.2023.310037.2453
Abstract
The re-examination of any political or jurisprudential school, while showing its strengths and weaknesses, creates an opportunity for excellence and continuity of the teachings of that school. The schools of jurisprudence and the political systems arising from them are no exception to this general rule. In today's world, on the one hand, with the dominance of liberal and materialist systems, and on the other hand, due to the different political approach of the schools of jurisprudence, the political system of Islam has faced questions and challenges. Re-reading the evidence and its basics can lead to better flourishing and show less explained dimensions. The subject of the present study is to examine how the governorship is exercised in governance relations from the perspective of the Najaf School of Jurisprudence.It is clear that entering this space requires an initial establishment in the field of evidence. In this article, the researcher uses a descriptive-analytical method and focuses on the opinions and sayings of the elders of the Najaf school of jurisprudence and the centrality of the rule of non-guardianship over others, and uses Sheikh Ansari's method in creating the principle. To the extent of the original drunk
Evidence is needed.
Keywords
)